GOPER wrote:Now, I know that Rush has got you Talk Radio Types all worked up aboutComprehensive Immigration Reform for Undocumented Americans, CampaignFinance Reform, and other issues important to the Conservatism. I knowhe is saying that John McCain is not a conservative.
Wow, this is a sure-fire way to win over disgruntled conservatives. Label us "Talk Radio Types" and imply that we are mindless drones following Rush. Way to go! You are either Tom Davis (R-VA) or the only person in the party stupider than Tom. Congratulations on losing any chance of winning us over in your first sentence. Well done!
By the way, we are not terribly concerned about "undocumented Americans." It is all the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS who are NOT Americans that get us riled up. And you have to be ignorant to call McCain-Feingold "campaign finance reform." Look at the money the Dems are raking in and tell me that McCain-Feingold did anything to reform campaign finance. The only thing it did was to step on my right to exercise political speech during an election campaign. Ironically,
McCain-Feingold may cost McCain the election because the only campaign it is affecting seems to be John's. He has so far been out-raised by the Dems by 5 1/2 to 1.
GOPER wrote:But thefact is, while John McCain has taken some Center to Right positions onsome of the more minor issues, ultimatley he is a much better candidatethan Barack Obama. John McCain is very experienced in matters ofnational security. Your very saftey depends on your vote. And he is aconservative on most issues, like Health Care.
Yes, McCain has only offended conservatives over some minor issues like the first amendment, national security at the border, economic growth (tax cuts, MMGW, and Marxist statements about "
unfettered capitalism"). Yes, the problem seems to be one of understanding. We understand the constitution and John McCain does not.
GOPER wrote:You Talk Radiofolks are very important to our Voting Margins, and if we lost yourvote, it could cost us the election, unless McCain wins over some moreindependents.
In the words of Ronald Reagan, "there you go again." "Talk Radio Folks." Mind if we refer to you as "RINO, Socialist Sellout Folks?" You spend your time insulting us and then belatedly realize you sort of need us to actually win. Maybe you should have thought of that in 2006 when your sellout cost you the majority in both houses of Congress.
GOPER wrote:You all say you admire Ronald Reagan, and RonaldReagan was a great compromiser. How do you think he beat the USSR? bycompromising! Do you think he would just slam his fist on the table andwalk away from the Republican party if things didnt go his way all thetime? Of course not. Ronald Reagan would have compromised some of his positions and supported the Republican Nominee!!!
Lets win one for the Gipper's party in 2008!!!!!
Ronald Reagan won and implemented HIS policies of limiting government and opposing evil. There was no compromise involved in the defeat of the Soviet Union. He set out to destroy a horrible and evil system and he did so in less than 9 years. He was routinely reviled for even trying until it worked. Excuse me, but that isn't called "compromise." It is called "leadership" or "doing the right thing." You as "RINO, Socialist Sellout Folk" evidently don't recognize either of those things.
And allow me to make one last point. The GOP is obviously no longer the Gipper's party. He left the Democrats when they sold out. I have no doubt at all that Reagan would have left the GOP by this point for selling out. Go peddle your tripe elsewhere.
And try to use a spellchecker the next time you pop in to insult us. It is really galling to read your insulting, arrogant, elitist, factually incorrect emails when they are full of spelling errors and typos.