Goper said: Even Ronald Reagan compromised once in a while. Thats how he was able to stay a republican for his whole life.


Ronald Reagan was a Democrat for most of his life. He switched to the Republican Party when he realized the Democrat Party had left him. He would leave the Republican Party today if he saw what you "Moderate Conservatives" were doing to the Party.

He did not compromise. He presented strength and he never veered from his conservative principles. He did not bend over to the Democrats by crossing the aisle and joining them.

Obama is a marxist, not a socialist, and those of you in the Republican Party had better start telling people who he is, what his ideology is and what his plans are or McCain will not stand a chance. Grow some cajones already.

GOPER wrote:Anyone who disagrees with you must be a nutjob, huh? your arrogance is amazing. There are 500 other people on this site I can convince, forget you.

You honestly thought you could come in to this forum and start insulting people and calling them names and regurgitating McCain web site material and somehow convince anyone to vote for John McCain?  

I have heard John McCain repeat this same drivel for well over a year.  Why do you suppose you are going to convince anyone by repeating it yet again?  How stupid to you suppose people are?  Talk about arrogant or just plain naive and stupid....

Let me assure you that you won't influence anyone not wearing diapers with the tripe you are posting.  If you don't realize that then you need to retreat somewhere and contemplate your message.

paleocon wrote:Al Franken, who would be considered a "liberal liberal liberal moron moron moron" on my earlier scale, is looking for someone to pay his back taxes and that isn't going to be me!  

If you don't like Barr and Bernhard how about Whoopi Goldberg?

Nope. I'm not a great compromiser like Reagan. Megyn or no deal. I am a man of lust . . . , er, . . . um, principle.

SoldiersMum wrote:Goper said: Even Ronald Reagan compromised once in a while. Thats how he was able to stay a republican for his whole life.


Ronald Reagan was a Democrat for most of his life. He switched to the Republican Party when he realized the Democrat Party had left him. He would leave the Republican Party today if he saw what you "Moderate Conservatives" were doing to the Party.

He did not compromise. He presented strength and he never veered from his conservative principles. He did not bend over to the Democrats by crossing the aisle and joining them.

Obama is a marxist, not a socialist, and those of you in the Republican Party had better start telling people who he is, what his ideology is and what his plans are or McCain will not stand a chance. Grow some cajones already.

Has the RNC been licensed to use Hillary's testicle lock box?

bedbug wrote:

SoldiersMum wrote:Goper said: Even Ronald Reagan compromised once in a while. Thats how he was able to stay a republican for his whole life.


Ronald Reagan was a Democrat for most of his life. He switched to the Republican Party when he realized the Democrat Party had left him. He would leave the Republican Party today if he saw what you "Moderate Conservatives" were doing to the Party.

He did not compromise. He presented strength and he never veered from his conservative principles. He did not bend over to the Democrats by crossing the aisle and joining them.

Obama is a marxist, not a socialist, and those of you in the Republican Party had better start telling people who he is, what his ideology is and what his plans are or McCain will not stand a chance. Grow some cajones already.

Has the RNC been licensed to use Hillary's testicle lock box?

I dont think that was necessary. We need to be P.C and respectful of our opponents. These kind of non-bipartisan, immature, jokes Rush makes are not good for the country.

GOPER wrote:
I dont think that was necessary. We need to be P.C and respectful of our opponents. These kind of non-bipartisan, immature, jokes Rush makes are not good for the country.

No, what is bad for the country is that you, as a Republican, are supporting the very concept of "P.C." which is an infringement on our basic right to free speech.  What is bad for the country is that you are supporting a candidate who wants to use the power of the US government to limit how much compensation can be paid to someone under the terms of a private contract.  What is bad for the country is that you can't even recognize Marxism when you see it.  

What is bad for the country is that you have no idea what the terms you are using mean such as "non-partisan."  These comments are, in fact, PARTISAN.  What is bad for the country is that you cannot spell or reason your way through a 100 word post.  

What is bad for the country is that you don't understand anything about our constitution and the intent of our founding fathers and will flush all that away when some politician lies to you repeatedly claiming he can "fix" all these problems when, in fact, he is responsible for creating and perpetuating the problems he now offers to fix.  

That is what is bad for the country.

SoldiersMum wrote:

Ronald Reagan was a Democrat for mostof his life.  He switched to the Republican Party when he realized theDemocrat Party had left him.  He would leave the Republican Party todayif he saw what you "Moderate Conservatives" were doing to theParty.  

Ronald Reagan Left the Deomcratic Party becausehe got a copy of Bill Buckley's National Review in a"Brown Paper Bag"as he once said. He began to study Far-Right ideaology, and thenbrought it to the republican party . Nixon realized this and famouslysaid "we cant win with just the buckleyites, but we cant win withoutthem".

Now, John McCain realizes this and is making efforts toreach out to angry, disgruntled ultra-cons/ buckleyites/Talk radiofolks/Far Righters/dittoheads/whatever the hell you like to be called.Like his health care plan. In his last appearance on Larry King,Michael Moore said that he could never vote for McCain, because hishealth care plan was too conservative. Do call that a liberal healthcare plan? Now will you vote for mcCain?

SoldiersMum wrote:Hedid not compromise.  He presented strength and he never veered from hisconservative principles.  He did not bend over to the Democrats bycrossing the aisle and joining them.

John McCain didntcompromise, while he was in Vietnam, and being interrorigated. He wasoffered to get sent home because his father was an Admrial, but JohnMcCain refused, and continued untill he could personhally assure thatall of his troops were safe. And now he doesnt compromise, even whenCampaign Finance reform is giving him a money disadvantage, because ofhis amazing commitment to clean opolitics. Yes John McCain alwayssticks to his guns and give bipartisan solutions for America Unitedunder one hope.

SoldiersMum wrote:Obama is a marxist, not asocialist, and those of you in the Republican Party had better starttelling people who he is, what his ideology is and what his plans areor McCain will not stand a chance.  Grow some cajones already.

Now,Obama isnt calling tor a vioilent revolution, and I read somewhere thatthat is a requirement for Marxism. He amy have some socialist parts ofosome of his ideas, but he should be respected. That kind of diviseiverherotic hurts america, and prevents the United  bi partisan solutionsof the future.

Now, i know you Talk Radio Folks are very angry, but why this election? You Comopromised before. Rush liked Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. both moderates. We need you more than ever.

paleocon wrote:No, what is bad for the country is that you, as aRepublican, are supporting the very concept of "P.C." which is aninfringement on our basic right to free speech.  What is bad for thecountry is that you are supporting a candidate who wants to use thepower of the US government to limit how much compensation can be paidto someone under the terms of a private contract.  What is bad for thecountry is that you can't even recognize Marxism when you see it.  

I am not supporting it as a slight at conservatives it is respect and politieness. John McCain is comitted to compromising for real solutions for America, and this divisiveness prevents that from happening. We need to put Bi- Partisan america for solutions for our problems!

paleocon wrote:No, what is bad for the country is that you, as a Republican, aresupporting the very concept of "P.C." which is an infringement on ourbasic right to free speech.  What is bad for the country is that youare supporting a candidate who wants to use the power of the USgovernment to limit how much compensation can be paid to someone underthe terms of a private contract.  What is bad for the country is thatyou can't even recognize Marxism when you see it.  

This is over the top. John McCain is comitted to the free market, but is appropiately skeptical of big business. On solutions like health care, John McCain is a conservative. John McCain's health care plan was rejected by Michael Moore on Larry King because it was quote "too Conservative". Now, i know you Conservatives are agnry but it is a good thing that John McCain is comitted to restricting and regulating the pay of greedy CEOs. Hitting big business is popular with many voters, and could help us gain important Moderate and Independent votes.

paleocon wrote:What is bad for the country is that you don't understand anythingabout our constitution and the intent of our founding fathers and willflush all that away when some politician lies to you repeatedlyclaiming he can "fix" all these problems when, in fact, he isresponsible for creating and perpetuating the problems he now offers tofix.  

John McCain is a Moderate Conservative on our constitution. He has pledged to appoint "Strict Constructionist Judges". He voted, by the way for Robert Bork, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas,  John Roberts and Smauel Alito. He will appoint conservative Judges who will understand the constitution and support all those issues, like Gun Cntrol, Abortion, and Gay Marrige. On the other hand if Barack Obama wins he would appoint liberals who would destroy the family and ethics.


Lets win one for the gipper! Lets win one for conservatives everywhere! Vote to John McCain in 2008!

GOPER wrote:Now, i know you Talk Radio Folks are very angry, but why this election? You Comopromised before. Rush liked Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. both moderates. We need you more than ever.

We are tired of being told to "hold our noses" and vote for a liberal.  Nixon, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. told us they would govern conservatively and then failed to do so.  We are tired of being lied to and are thus no longer willing to hold our noses.  

GOPER wrote:I am not supporting it as a slight at conservatives it is respect and politieness. John McCain is comitted to compromising for real solutions for America, and this divisiveness prevents that from happening. We need to put Bi- Partisan america for solutions for our problems!

Calling "illegal immigrants" "undocumented Americans" is an insult to Americans.  You are so concerned about not insulting "illegal immigrants" who are not entitled to vote that you will insult conservatives who are!  "Bi-partisan" is the code word for conservatives allowing socialists to do what they want.  That you don't recognize that is amazing.  

GOPER wrote:This is over the top. John McCain is comitted to the free market, but is appropiately skeptical of big business. On solutions like health care, John McCain is a conservative....Now, i know you Conservatives are agnry but it is a good thing that John McCain is comitted to restricting and regulating the pay of greedy CEOs. Hitting big business is popular with many voters, and could help us gain important Moderate and Independent votes.

What is "over the top" is that John McCain believes anything in the constitution allows him to meddle in private contracts between employers and employees.  The government now believes it can set minimum and maximum wages and salarys!  That is state control of the employment marketplace.  That is "M A R X I S M!"  Clearly you must understand that.  

"Hitting big business" is popular with socialists and Marxists.  The constitution does not permit the government to intrude in private economic decisions.  That is state control of business and is only slightly different from outright nationalization.  That is "M A R X I S M!"  Clearly you must understand that.  

GOPER wrote:John McCain is a Moderate Conservative on our constitution.

There is no such thing as a "moderate conservative."  John McCain has attacked our constitution for years.  He supports legislation that is clearly unconstitutional and therefore, if he appointed strick constructionists, those appointees would vote against many of McCain's own legislative achievements.  Furthermore, McCain can only nominate.  The Senate must confirm.  Therefore, McCain, the great compromiser, will be pressured to choose judges the liberal Democrats will accept.  For these reasons I do not accept McCain's pledge to nominate strick constructionists.  

GOPER wrote:Lets win one for the gipper! Lets win one for conservatives everywhere! Vote to John McCain in 2008!

John McCain is NOT "The Gipper."  A vote for John McCain will not be a win for conservatives.  

I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR JOHN MCCAIN!  

GOPER wrote:

bedbug wrote:

SoldiersMum wrote:Goper said: Even Ronald Reagan compromised once in a while. Thats how he was able to stay a republican for his whole life.


Ronald Reagan was a Democrat for most of his life. He switched to the Republican Party when he realized the Democrat Party had left him. He would leave the Republican Party today if he saw what you "Moderate Conservatives" were doing to the Party.

He did not compromise. He presented strength and he never veered from his conservative principles. He did not bend over to the Democrats by crossing the aisle and joining them.

Obama is a marxist, not a socialist, and those of you in the Republican Party had better start telling people who he is, what his ideology is and what his plans are or McCain will not stand a chance. Grow some cajones already.

Has the RNC been licensed to use Hillary's testicle lock box?

I dont think that was necessary. We need to be P.C and respectful of our opponents. These kind of non-bipartisan, immature, jokes Rush makes are not good for the country.

I have genuinely pondered this statement. And, I have come to a conclusion. Real respect is born of strength, character, integrity, fortitude, discipline, etc. Americans respect the underdog because he struggles against the odds to fulfill a goal that conventional wisdom deems impossible. Rugged individualism.

Political Correctness was spawned by power mongers. The PC gods attempt to intimidate people into submission. If you say this word, or that word, you are a bad person. Conform or suffer the consequences. Don't say what you think, say what people want to hear. Say what your peers expect you to say. Don't be different.

Here are 2 bits of American wisdom for you, one from Hollywood and one from a midwestern mother.

"Don't respect anyone who doesn't respect you back." - Boyz In The Hood

"Nobody respects a pussy." - my mother