Here;   I know this is not going to help you.  That you'll probably avoid reading it but still HERE it is when you decide to leave this insanity behind and come into the light.  These are the Sarah Palin rumors with the truth.   Read just a few at a time.  I wouldn't share them with your friends if i were you.  

http://explorations.chasrmartin.com/2008/09/06/palin-rumors/

Calypso Jones wrote:Here;   I know this is not going to help you.  That you'll probably avoid reading it but still HERE it is when you decide to leave this insanity behind and come into the light.  These are the Sarah Palin rumors with the truth.   Read just a few at a time.  I wouldn't share them with your friends if i were you.  

http://explorations.chasrmartin.com/2008/09/06/palin-rumors/

Interesting link.  Not sure why you thought I wouldn't read it.  Many of your posts are very confrontational and seem to assume the worst in people that may not agree with you.  It's not nice.

So how do you compare Sen. Obama having NO military experience WHATsoever against Gov. Palin who was in essence the CIC of the AK National Guard....plus she knows how to shoot a rifle.   Sen. Obama doesn't.     So he's qualified for the position of CiC for what? reason?

Calypso, now you've done it.  You have asked the question that no liberal can honestly answer.  What qualifications does Obama have to be CIC?

Selection between Palin and Obama is really no contest. I would have to vote for Howdy Doody before I would vote for Obama. Obama has no experience in anything but running for office. Obama is Hollywood entertainment and socialist candidate. I believe Obama was chosen simply because he is black, can follow a script, speaks well and will be the fool / foil of his backers. His world view is more than naive it is inherently dangerous. His grasp of the economy is foolish as the current do nothing congress who every time they attempt to control it ruin it as we see plainly now. A pox on all Republicans that have enabled and even help them do it. I could go on but I will not at this time.

If you can't see the relevancy of it dear then there's really no point in discussing it with you.   It's obvious.  You are an Obamabot and it can't be helped.  You would sell this country to marxism without any more care than choosing your latest lipstick color...oh pardon me...you'd put more thought into your lipstick color i'm sure.

Calypso Jones wrote:If you can't see the relevancy of it dear then there's really no point in discussing it with you.   It's obvious.  You are an Obamabot and it can't be helped.  You would sell this country to marxism without any more care than choosing your latest lipstick color...oh pardon me...you'd put more thought into your lipstick color i'm sure.

Petunia, don't feel bad about Calpyso's response.  I've been posting to this web site for a couple of weeks.  Calypso constantly maligns anyone who doesn't agree with him.  He *very* occasionally has interesting things to say - but he drowns them in personal attacks.  He's as guilty as anyone fringe lefty in this regard.

theRat wrote:

Calypso Jones wrote:If you can't see the relevancy of it dear then there's really no point in discussing it with you. It's obvious. You are an Obamabot and it can't be helped. You would sell this country to marxism without any more care than choosing your latest lipstick color...oh pardon me...you'd put more thought into your lipstick color i'm sure.

Petunia, don't feel bad about Calpyso's response. I've been posting to this web site for a couple of weeks. Calypso constantly maligns anyone who doesn't agree with him. He *very* occasionally has interesting things to say - but he drowns them in personal attacks. He's as guilty as anyone fringe lefty in this regard.

gross-mischaracterization mr. rat.

one thing that you consistently do mr. rat, which is "obvious" as you say, is to premise a conclusion with questions a.k.a. socratic persuasion. perhaps you are aware, the principles of the socratic are popularized in its latin root ethos pathos logos or, translated into an english colloquial here, upon one's own values can be constructed trusting relationships from which you may impart logic. until you have constructed such a foundation, you are incapable of logical persuasion.

a significant difference between your line of questions and the socratic process that you perhaps observed in liberal arts or law class is that your professors had a presumption of ethos from which to construct relationships with you, the student. that's something a website cannot offer. consequently we on a public forum must focus on our logic or simply that conclusion of yours. from these conclusions we are able to construct relationships from which to better understand our respective values. a 180 on socrates.

whether you can learn from this is a gauge of your ability to think critically. intelligently. takes courage.

another important difference with your postings is that your professors carefully prepared for class, and for the most part with the end-game of getting you to think. unfortunately some students only learn to regurgitate, desperately clinging to academic notions around which they define their fragile existence. maybe that's you and maybe its not, can't really tell yet, but you are most certainly not prepared for class. and what seems to happen is you ask increasingly desperate questions as the logic of your process loses sight of its conclusion. eventually it all breaks down and here we find you scolding a student who is perfectly innocent of your charges.

that's just not right mr. rat.

concentrate on preparing for the class. then you can teach. or learn, its really up to you why you're interacting here.

seabee wrote:

theRat wrote:

Calypso Jones wrote:If you can't see the relevancy of it dear then there's really no point in discussing it with you. It's obvious. You are an Obamabot and it can't be helped. You would sell this country to marxism without any more care than choosing your latest lipstick color...oh pardon me...you'd put more thought into your lipstick color i'm sure.

Petunia, don't feel bad about Calpyso's response. I've been posting to this web site for a couple of weeks. Calypso constantly maligns anyone who doesn't agree with him. He *very* occasionally has interesting things to say - but he drowns them in personal attacks. He's as guilty as anyone fringe lefty in this regard.

gross-mischaracterization mr. rat.

one thing that you consistently do mr. rat, which is "obvious" as you say, is to premise a conclusion with questions a.k.a. socratic persuasion. perhaps you are aware, the principles of the socratic are popularized in its latin root ethos pathos logos or, translated into an english colloquial here, upon one's own values can be constructed trusting relationships from which you may impart logic. until you have constructed such a foundation, you are incapable of logical persuasion.

a significant difference between your line of questions and the socratic process that you perhaps observed in liberal arts or law class is that your professors had a presumption of ethos from which to construct relationships with you, the student. that's something a website cannot offer. consequently we on a public forum must focus on our logic or simply that conclusion of yours. from these conclusions we are able to construct relationships from which to better understand our respective values. a 180 on socrates.

whether you can learn from this is a gauge of your ability to think critically. intelligently. takes courage.

another important difference with your postings is that your professors carefully prepared for class, and for the most part with the end-game of getting you to think. unfortunately some students only learn to regurgitate, desperately clinging to academic notions around which they define their fragile existence. maybe that's you and maybe its not, can't really tell yet, but you are most certainly not prepared for class. and what seems to happen is you ask increasingly desperate questions as the logic of your process loses sight of its conclusion. eventually it all breaks down and here we find you scolding a student who is perfectly innocent of your charges.

that's just not right mr. rat.

concentrate on preparing for the class. then you can teach. or learn, its really up to you why you're interacting here.

Click on "Calpyso Jones".  Look how many of his posts malign other people.  He's personally maligned me several times.  Now look at my posts.  I've never maligned anyone in this forum.  I don't swear at people - I don't tell them their heads are up their arse.  I'm actually here trying to find some common ground.

We will all get a chance to vote for Palin for President in 2012. Poor Mrs. Clinton.