Candance is right. The Liberal movement is all about tolerance as long as we agree with them in every way.

Conformity will be tolerated. Non-conformity will be eradicated. There is no tolerance of conservatives in the Liberals agenda.

I, too, agree that tolerance is a farce within the liberal movement. As a die-hard conservative, I'm definitely not feeling the love....

Tolerance is really defined as bi-partisanship which actually means BEND OVER conservatives.. No bending..no tolerance. That's why they like McCain. His Fossilness is the Bendover King!

paleocon wrote:Candance is right.  The Liberal movement is all about tolerance as long as we agree with them in every way.  

Conformity will be tolerated.  Non-conformity will be eradicated.  There is no tolerance of conservatives in the Liberals agenda.

Intolerance will not be tolerated.  More cognitive dissonance from the Left

How many useless, context-irrelevant, liberal buzzwords can you name/describe?


Change = for the sake of change without regard to what we change to

Hope = not hope for anything, not hope that something particular happens, just hope (no context)

Compromise = for the sake of compromise, which essentially means abandoning anything resembling principle (or even fact) for the sake of not having well defined principles (easy for libs)

Inequality/Equality = Not in Rights.  Not in treatment by the Law.  Rather, in everything and every possible way- especially economic wealth = "eliminating poverty by making everyone poor"

etc.
etc.

The left in America preys on good-hearted folks like Taylor. They know you want peace and harmony. They know you want to be seen to as a kind Christian. So they will actually use that against you.

They're very good at finding shields to hide behind - sob stories, children, harmless people in love. These things become weapons they will use. Sure, their mission is to destroy the family unit, euthanize the disabled, force you into communism and demonize your church...but they're doing it for little children...they're doing it for lonely homosexuals...they're doing it for the homeless and the widows...and if you don't like it you're a heartless Pharisee.

Name calling is very effective against tender-hearted Christians. If they can convince you that Jesus would be okay with it and you're being a bad disciple, they can get you to go along with anything. How do you think the Nazis rose to power in Germany? By getting Christians on their side. How was the IRA so successful in Ireland? By claiming they fought to save the church.

You need to get thicker skin and stop worrying about looking like a bad Christian. They will keep on and keep on until your faith is so watered down it doesn't make a difference anymore. Ann Coulter has written about this issue many times...I suggest you study her work.

I second what Candance just said.

Don't let yourself be fooled by what Liberals think makes a "good" or "bad" Christian.  They haven't a clue about Christianity - or even of "good" or "bad".

Don't be fooled by liberals' ridiculous misinterpretation of "judge not, lest ye be judged" as if Jesus were opposed to judging right or wrong.  In point of fact, Jesus' entire message was about judging good vs evil and living righteously and avoiding wickedness.  How could anyone tell the difference between righteousness and wickedness without making a judgment.  Jesus was a very judgmental dude.

Jesus also didn't condemn, replace, or obsolete the Laws of Moses.  Murder, theft, adultery, covetousness, prostitution, and homosexuality are all still wickedness.

Most of all, don't be fooled by liberals' absurd misinterpretation of Christian "forgiveness".  Forgiveness is NOT Permission.  Forgiveness is for past sins/wickedness, not Permission to continue one's sinful ways.  In John, Jesus forgives the adulteress and tells her to "go, and sin no more".  He doesn't say, "go, and keep on whorin""

I'm not a Christian, but to the best of my knowledge, there's nothing about Christianity which suggests that you must accept, or tolerate, any and all behavior.  In fact, I'm pretty sure that Judaism and Christianity are about discerning (judging) between right and wrong, good and evil, righteousness and wickedness, and what is acceptable and what is unacceptable.  If it's unacceptable, it should not be tolerated.

Amen Eyas!

There is a difference between judging someone's heart and paying attention to the fruit they bear. When I look at Hillary Clinton, I can't sit here and say "she's a bad person with a black heart." But I see her communist leanings, her willingness to cheat, her plans for this country, and regardless of her motives she's on the wrong path.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Our fear of judging people has caused us to go in the other extreme to the point of a new kind of legalism. It's verboten to call out sin or complain about someone's behavior. It's okay to slap labels on you - you're a Pharisee, you're legalistic...but don't you dare label anyone else.

If Paul had agreed to sit down and shut up and stop preaching at others, half the New Testament would have disappeared. It's not about being on a pedastal above people or acting like you can do no wrong. It's about recognizing that wickedness will prevail when we stop confronting it.