Taylor wrote:Now I know what the AR in AR-15 means! Anyway, yeah the military could over throw the gov't with out hesitation.

Wait, you just found out what an AR-15 is?  Do you know what a .45 ACP is?  

You have a lot of work before you are ready to become a true right wing extremist.   Better get cracking!

paleocon wrote:

Taylor wrote:Now I know what the AR in AR-15 means! Anyway, yeah the military could over throw the gov't with out hesitation.

Wait, you just found out what an AR-15 is?  Do you know what a .45 ACP is?  

You have a lot of work before you are ready to become a true right wing extremist.   Better get cracking!

Well no, whever I hear extremist with RIGHT WING before it, it makes me think of terrorists and no taxes (don't ask please) but yeah, don't say that.

Back to the very thing which inspired the original topic of this thread, the recent movie "Juno".

The movie, tho I didn't see it, apparently glamororizes underage sex and teen pregnancy.

I just found out that, at the 80th Academy Awards, the award for best original screenplay went to Diablo Cody, the former stripper turned screenwriter of the movie "Juno".

Written by a stripper-whore, ... shocker!

Eyas wrote:Back to the very thing which inspired the original topic of this thread, the recent movie "Juno".

I hardly ever go to first-run movies.  Most current PG-13 releases would have been rated R or X when I was a kid.  Most recent films have been very dark and I get enough of that from life.  I would much rather see a good comedy.  

Buy, Hollywood continues its disturbing path toward the "dark side" and churns out awful stuff that bombs at the box office instead of turning out the stuff that actually gets people to come to the theaters.  Tickets around here are now $8 for a matinee and it costs $30 to get two popcorns and a couple of drinks.  I am not interested in paying that much to see two homosexual cowboys.  I wonder when they are gonna make a film about two homosexual Native Americans?

Speaking of homosexuality. Why is homosexuality o.k., but polygamy, and incest are not?

I'm flicking thru the channels, & I land on an "E" channel show about the best/worst Oscar moments. Among these was the vaguely sexual relationship and kiss between Angelina Jolie and her Brother several years ago (before Brangelina and before Billy-Bob). All of the no-name "comedians" that comment on the clips, including the gay ones, were grossed-out by this display of "too-close" sibling affection.

I also found it weird & disturbing; but how is it that homosexuality is beyond reproach, and yet incest among "consenting", "adult" siblings is still "gross", "creepy", even "immoral"?

How is it that the so-called "mainstream" culture accepts or advocates gay-marriage, and yet balks at polygamy? Polygamy has a long and often-respected history, and is obviously still practiced in many parts of the world; whereas, homosexual marriage has absolutely no precedent.

Now, I recognize that those pushing for an elimination of all morality and ethics in this country may (probably do) want to eventually normalize polygamy and incest (not to mention pedophilia). But at this particular moment in time, there is still a tremendous hypocrisy within the homosexual lobby, and especially among those "tolerant" heterosexuals who are so understanding of homosexuals that they will advocate it as a normal, acceptable behavior. They will call anyone who suggests that homosexuality is wrong a "homophobe", and yet they will still mock, scorn, and look with disgust upon polygamy or incest. What is the difference?

I think it's important to play devil's advocate with members of the homosexual lobby and their "uber-tolerant" supporters to point out this hypocrisy, whenever forced to argue or discuss homosexuality with such a person. Ask them to explain why homosexuality is acceptable, while incest (among adults) is not?

Eyas wrote:Speaking of homosexuality.  Why is homosexuality o.k., but polygamy, and incest are not?

Almost every conservative scholar agrees that the push for homosexual marriage will ultimately open the door to any and every conceivable "marital" arrangement including polygamy, group marriages, and incest and even human/non-human relationships.  

Once "traditional" marriage is destroyed there will be no end to the list of demands for accepting any relationships between any kind and number of humans and even between species.  

"Homosexual marriage" advocates realized they cannot openly admit this so they claim they are only interested in "homosexual marriage" but once marriage is redefined it will immediately include any kind of union.

You mean the North American Man/Mare Love Association (NAMMLA) coming to a neighborhood near you if you live in San Francisco?? Nancy Pelosi will march in their parade alongside them like she did for the NAMBLA crowd. She can't refuse or she'll be in contempt of the ACLU.

My Christian values say let all people just live in peace meaning the gay people etc etc, well I don't know my conservative values are starting to erode my Christian values in a way.

Hey I saw Juno and I didn't get the feeling it glamorized teen sex. The film actually makes it clear that Juno regrets doing it and then shows all the uncomfortable aspects of being pregnant. Of all the bad movies out there to pick on, Juno aint one of em.

Taylor wrote:My Christian values say let all people just live in peace meaning the gay people etc etc, well I don't know my conservative values are starting to erode my Christian values in a way.

Heed my words Taylor...the secular left's agenda is not to live in peace and get along with everyone. They want to redefine familes, change the church into their image, limit your ability to raise your children right, and supress your free speech to complain.

Why are they doing this? Because they don't want anyone to tell them they are wrong. Preachers are annoying because they gripe about sin. Parents are bad because they teach moral principles. Folks like Rush should be off the air because he's impeding their progress to wipe out conservatives.

And paleocon is right: homosexual marriage is just the beginning. Terri Shiavo was just the beginning. Banning hate speech is just the beginning. They won't stop until every conservative in America is shut up for good.