What`s your take on Obama`s $845 BILLION Global Poverty Act?

Re: What`s your take on Obama`s $845 BILLION Global Poverty Act?

Postby SoldiersMum on 09/22/08, 12:23 pm

Obama's Global Poverty Act is another step to take the US into socialism.  Not only does it commandiere a huge chunk of our GDP for the UN to redistribute to third world countries (Remember oil for food and the great job some UN members did of putting money in their own pockets?  Remember just exactly who is running those third world countries..can you say alot of dictators?), but it encompasses the UN Millenium Declaration.  The Millenium Declaration imposes the Kyoto Treaty..more UN mandated Global Warming monies and it encompasses the UN gun laws which would eliminate our 2nd amendment.  I believe it also encompasses LOST but am not positive about that one.  

Let's put it this way..if Gyorgy Soros loves it, if the UN is salivating, if Nancy Pelosi thinks it is wonderful..and Harry Reid, if the environmental wackjobs are jumping for joy..how is this a good bill??????

Liberalism=socialism=communism.

Plutarch warned, "The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits."
User avatar
SoldiersMum
Moderator
 
Posts: 1780
Joined: 09/22/07, 1:05 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: What`s your take on Obama`s $845 BILLION Global Poverty Act?

Postby johnwk on 09/23/08, 1:49 pm


Obama means business!

Susan Rice, one of Obama’s top foreign policy advisers, says the U.S. should give 0.7 percent of its Gross Domestic Product to developing nations. SEE:Obama Laments Debt, But Promises Billions for Anti-Poverty Program
by FOXNews.com
Friday, September 19, 2008
By Bill Sammon

It is also interesting to note what Obama/Biden and the rest of these world class Marxists have in their mind regarding funding …. a global tax imposed upon the United States Taxpayers by the United Nations, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels!


Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the U.N.’s “Millennium Project,” says that the U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends. Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.’s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the “Millennium Development Goals,” this amounts to $845 billion. And the only way to raise that kind of money, Sachs has written, is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels. ________ see: Barack Obama's Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote


Question is, will McCain ask Obama about his $845 BILLION Global Poverty Act during the debate this Friday. We really need to know more about the real CHANGE Obama has in mind for America.

McCain should also ask Obama why he attempted to silence a talk show on WGN two times! See: WGN-AM again target of Obama Campaign


JWK


If we can make 51 percent of America’s population dependent upon a federal government check, we can then buy their vote, keep ourselves in power and keep the remaining portion of America’s working population enslaved to pay the bills ____ our Marxist Democrat Party’s game plan, a plan to establish a federal plantation on American soil and send its wealth abroad.
johnwk
 
Posts: 64
Joined: 01/06/08, 6:46 pm

Re: Obama fine with new tax - UN taxing the United States!

Postby johnwk on 09/26/08, 5:33 pm

Obama fine with new tax - UN taxing the United States!

For those who do not believe Obama is working to allow the United Nations to impose a 0.7 percent tax upon the gross national product of the United States, here are the facts.

Under Obama’s bill, the president is required to devise a "comprehensive strategy" to meet the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

The ultimate aim of the Millennium Development project is to have the American Taxpayers submit to the United Nations imposing a tax upon them amounting to 0.7 percent of the GNP of the United States. In one report a UN panel asserts that membership on the UN Security Council “be required to fulfill international commitments to official development assistance, including the 0.7 target” which is to be imposed upon “rich-countries”

Obama’s bill is designed to legislatively require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to “achievement of the Millennium Development Goal ” which includes the 0.7 targeted tax upon the GNP of the United States!

But I guess these pesky little facts mean nothing to those who are very much in favor of enslaving the American People to a United Nations goal of imposing a 0.7 percent tax upon America’s GNP

Bottome line is, Obama is working to enslave the American people to a United Nations tax!

What I don’t understand about Obama is, we have children living in Harlem who go to bed hungry at night and Obama wants to allow the UN to tax hardworking fathers living in Harlem, who can barely meet their own economic needs, and then have the U.N. redistribute their paychecks to poor countries, as opposed to the “rich-countries” [meaning the United States] which Obama agrees ought to be taxed by the U.N.

Question is, will McCain ask Obama why he wants to commit the American People to a new tax --- a UN tax of 0.7 percent of America‘s GNP?.

Why has our establishment big media [NBC, CBS, ABC CNN, MSNBC , The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc., ] not reported on Obama’s plan to commit the American People to a new tax --- a United Nation’s tax of 0.7 percent of America’s GNP?

JWK


``Change`` we can believe in if Obama is elected ---- tax our dollars and leave us with change.
johnwk
 
Posts: 64
Joined: 01/06/08, 6:46 pm

Previous

Return to 2008 Presidential Election

cron