Back to the SCOTUS ruling:

It seems that the Communists are unable to grasp the TRUE import of this decision.

They're all a-quiver with smug satisfaction that our enemies, in a time of WAR, are being given Constitutional Rights.

This is, indeed, important.  It's ridiculous.  It's sad.

But, I haven't heard a single Communist who understood that the Supreme Court has just declared itself superior to BOTH of the other two branches of our government  -- acting together, no less.

Regardless of what the issue is.  Imagine the outcry and uproar from the MSM if, instead, the SCOTUS had declared itself superior to Congress AND the President, if the President were a Communist, & if an issue were decided in favor of a Conservative (and Constitutional) viewpoint.

This is one of those threads that isn't even worth reading, as I can guarantee a bunch of jackasses from both sides of the aisle have turned the issue into some ignorant partisan brawl.

Its ironic that its so easy for these pukes in Washington to turn this into a wedge issue, when in fact so many Americans, from both sides of the aisle, are furiously opposed to illegal immigration, and so dearly want these posturing lying politicos of both parties to close the border and put a stop to this insanity.

But keep bickering, left right, left right. Its what they want. As long as you yahoos are bickerin' with your neighbors because of some ignorant partisan loyalties, you won't have the time, the inclination, or the unity to lodge any sort of substantive opposition to the actions of Washington.

When its not a "leftist" plot, its a "wingnut" plot.

Smile, citizens; BOTH sides in Washington are makin' jackasses of ya.

FatAddict wrote:This is one of those threads that isn't even worth reading, as I can guarantee a bunch of jackasses from both sides of the aisle have turned the issue into some ignorant partisan brawl.

That you decided to proclaim you don't need to read a thread before you start hurling expletives says a great deal about you.  

Read the threads before you start making comments.   Otherwise, no one here will take you seriously.  I'd rather not start another flame.  But, if you are intent on flaming, let me know now so I can just add you to my "ignore list."

FatAddict wrote:This is one of those threads that isn't even worth reading, as I can guarantee a bunch of jackasses from both sides of the aisle have turned the issue into some ignorant partisan brawl.

Its ironic that its so easy for these pukes in Washington to turn this into a wedge issue, when in fact so many Americans, from both sides of the aisle, are furiously opposed to illegal immigration, and so dearly want these posturing lying politicos of both parties to close the border and put a stop to this insanity.

But keep bickering, left right, left right. Its what they want. As long as you yahoos are bickerin' with your neighbors because of some ignorant partisan loyalties, you won't have the time, the inclination, or the unity to lodge any sort of substantive opposition to the actions of Washington.

When its not a "leftist" plot, its a "wingnut" plot.

Smile, citizens; BOTH sides in Washington are makin' jackasses of ya.

This would be amusing if it weren't so pathetic.  Apparently, FatAddict thinks someone died and made him God.  While stating how moronic we all are, without knowing one thing about us and our activism, while not knowing how many of us actively call and write our representatives and senators regularly on issues, write newpapers to voice opinions, call talk shows, or give money to people we think will represent our views, etc., etc., etc., he just puts us in the bickering jackass category.  All the while, he is espousing the right's position on illegal immigration.  

Smile, FatAddict, your's makin' a jackass of yourself.

FatAddict,

I don't know of a single "partisan" who regularly posts here.  Most of us are (almost) as disgusted with the Republican Party as we are with the Communist Party.

Although many average people on the left are opposed to Illegal Immigration, ALL politicians in the Communist Party are in favor of it.  

Many politicians (Senators and Congressmen) who are Republicans are also in favor of it -- and so is our President.  However, this is the position of a select group of REPUBLICANS, and is in no a "right-wing", or conservative position.

Most relevant here, though, is that of the 5 SCOTUS Justices who formed the majority in this case, 4 are "flaming" Communists, and one is the confused ball of crap known as the "swing vote" -- Justice Kennedy.

So, in this instance, it is very much a "left" vs. "right" issue.

I rest my case.

The braying is louder than even I expected.

FatAddict wrote:I rest my case.

The braying is louder than even I expected.

Um....Are you retarded?  Wearing a bicycle helmet right now?  Diapers?  Who dresses you?

In short, what the hell are you talking about ''I rest my case."

What case?  Why is it rested?

Can you form a coherent thought?

FatAddict wrote:I rest my case.

The braying is louder than even I expected.

Perhaps he is being literal.  Evidently, he is an agrarian worker and is tired and distracted from the effort to work with loud, domesticated livestock and has thus set down his case, or valise, in order to rest and collect his thoughts.  I confess nothing else he has said makes much sense so I will proceed under this assumption until he provides clarification.  

He seems to have some kind of “directional determination deficit disorder” and has difficulty distinguishing “left” from “right.”  This may be disconcerting for him if he “rested his valise” and cannot remember whether he placed it to his right or left.  Perhaps he is concerned the livestock may damage his valise?   In fact, he may suffer from other cognitive disorders that prevent him from making or recognizing "directional distinctions" and thus everything may appear to be "far off to the right" in his perception.  

Let's give the poor fellow another chance to clarify his spaciotemporal relationship to his valise and regain control of his livestock.