Sarah Palin

a1kjl · by **a1kjl** » 01/18/10, 10:12 am

Then I accept that argument in the light that Obama is far worse than a lame duck president. He is a traitor guilty of high crimes against the American people. He too should resign like Nixon.

Yo want to no something funny? Sarah Palin will still have more executive experience to lead this country than Obama even after his term in Office.

jrg907 · by **jrg907** » 01/19/10, 5:54 pm

There you go again A1. Why always over the top? Please go ahead and name me one example of the POTUS being guilty of treason and high crimes against the people of the US?
Nixon resigned one step ahead of impeachment.

a1kjl · by **a1kjl** » 01/20/10, 12:13 pm

jrg907 wrote:There you go again A1. Why always over the top? Please go ahead and name me one example of the POTUS being guilty of treason and high crimes against the people of the US?
Nixon resigned one step ahead of impeachment.

Obama is the first. I would not go over the top if it were not true. However, you make a good point. There appears a to be a difference in our definition of treason. Under the law, it is any act with planning to over through the government of a nation. But here we have a government attempting to destroy the way of life of its own citizens. Traditionally this is tyranny. But if the people are the source of the power for this country and a political party is attempting to usurp that power from its proper owners, I consider that treason. So, my word usage is slightly more advanced than your understanding. Much of what I have been talking about has been based on this insight.

jrg907 · by **jrg907** » 01/20/10, 12:48 pm

A1 that is not treason. That is called having an election. He won. He gets the benefits. There is no attempt to overthrow the government. If we do not like the outcome, it is still not treason. Maybe we should have run a better candidate against him. That is my real problem. McCain had no chance. Why do we continue to pick such sorry candidates?
Maybe we do not like what he is trying to do as POTUS but that should make us try to find a better candidate next time.

exmil · by **exmil** » 01/20/10, 1:13 pm

jrg907 wrote:A1 that is not treason. That is called having an election. He won. He gets the benefits. There is no attempt to overthrow the government. If we do not like the outcome, it is still not treason. Maybe we should have run a better candidate against him. That is my real problem. McCain had no chance. Why do we continue to pick such sorry candidates?
Maybe we do not like what he is trying to do as POTUS but that should make us try to find a better candidate next time.

We will never find a better candidate , there is no such thing.

I don't know why people don't understand , all we do is elect CORPORATE POLITIONS.

These people love $$$$$$$$$$$ , not AMERICA or AMERICAN people.

Dems are pissed off because health care didn't go far enough.

Repubs are pissed because health went too far.

When 80% of the people want us to get the hell out of the Middle East , all the elected people can do is send more troops to the Middle East.

Has anyone ever heard of RON PAUL ??????????????????????????

I guess not.

jrg907 · by **jrg907** » 01/20/10, 2:00 pm

This is where A1's rhetoric is so over the top. My guess is that if McCain had been elected, we would be in the exact same position today. Obama has not done anything that the true liberals wanted him to do. In fact, they are more disappointed in him than anyone.

jrg907 · by **jrg907** » 01/21/10, 4:06 pm

A1 still waiting on the examples of high crimes and treason.
While we wait, the Supreme Court ruled today that corporations can give any amount they want to any political campaign. We are so totally screwed.
A1 while you and people like you were screaming that Obama was everything from a faciast to a nazi, the Supreme Court just turned over the whole government to big business.

a1kjl · by **a1kjl** » 01/22/10, 12:09 pm

jrg907,
That is why High Crimes has never been effectively legally employed to convict a politician, it is simply to vague. Treason can be looked up in any dictionary and everything Obama has done rises to the definition of treason, whether or not you agree with me or not.

Now you criticize the Supreme Courts defense of the first Amendment. Obviously you don't know who got Obama elected, namely unions. The decision simply gives the Unions more competition and begins the process to remove the progressive-liberals such as yourself.

We will bring this nation back to center right and the liberals are free to return to their traditional terrorist methods of blowing things up and shooting people. That way we can begin prosecuting progressive liberals as the criminals they are instead of this false facade as real Americans. Anyone who would follow the likes of Mao, Stalin, Chavez, Castro and Hussein deserve the ends they get.

Face it, the liberal day in sun light has already begun to set. Please return to the proverbial closet and be quiet. Real people with actual intelligence will be taking over from this disastrous Administration has begun.

jrg907 · by **jrg907** » 01/22/10, 3:45 pm

A1 all I am asking for is one specific example. When you level charges that serious, I would think that you could at least give one specific example.

exmil · by **exmil** » 01/22/10, 7:45 pm

a1kjl wrote:jrg907,
That is why High Crimes has never been effectively legally employed to convict a politician, it is simply to vague. Treason can be looked up in any dictionary and everything Obama has done rises to the definition of treason, whether or not you agree with me or not.

Now you criticize the Supreme Courts defense of the first Amendment. Obviously you don't know who got Obama elected, namely unions. The decision simply gives the Unions more competition and begins the process to remove the progressive-liberals such as yourself.

We will bring this nation back to center right and the liberals are free to return to their traditional terrorist methods of blowing things up and shooting people. That way we can begin prosecuting progressive liberals as the criminals they are instead of this false facade as real Americans. Anyone who would follow the likes of Mao, Stalin, Chavez, Castro and Hussein deserve the ends they get.

Face it, the liberal day in sun light has already begun to set. Please return to the proverbial closet and be quiet. Real people with actual intelligence will be taking over from this disastrous Administration has begun.

http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html

I would think that you will look at the above link , then talk about " progressive liberals " as criminals and not real AMERICANS.

Look up JIM WEBB ( D-VA ) marine corps officer --navy cross--silver star--2 bronze stare--2 purple hearts

Joe Sestak ( D- PA ) USN RETIRED REAR ADMIRAL

Max Cleland --US ARMY --lost 2 legs--1 arm

I could go on with a list of 40-50 others , but whats the use.

I can think of TWO Repub's RON PAUL AND JOHN MCCAIN , CHUCK HAGEL AND BOB DOLE

Every time you want to call  DEMS/LIBERALS un-AMERICAN LOOK AT THE LIST AGAIN.

It is very sad to see how low the  NEOCONS can get.

I guess they watch and listen to far too many tv/radio talkers.

I would think that GOLDWATER AND REAGAN would not believe 99% of the crap that comes out of neocons .

Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Re: Sarah Palin

Who is online