Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby SoldiersMum on 10/17/07, 9:40 pm

I would like the name of this forum changed to the "Progressive Liberalism=Socialism=Communism Forum."  Why not call these people by their true name, socialists and communists.

I did some diligence and investigated the Progressive Congressional Caucus' goals, the Democrat Socialists of America's goals and The Communist Party USA goals and guess what, they are all one and the same.  I write OpEds for a blog and am writing a paper that I'll share here too when it is eventually finished.

Plutarch warned, "The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits."
User avatar
SoldiersMum
Moderator
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: 09/22/07, 1:05 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby Eyas on 10/18/07, 6:03 am

SoldiersMum wrote:I would like the name of this forum changed to the "Progressive Liberalism=Socialism=Communism Forum."  Why not call these people by their true name, socialists and communists.

I did some diligence and investigated the Progressive Congressional Caucus' goals, the Democrat Socialists of America's goals and The Communist Party USA goals and guess what, they are all one and the same.  I write OpEds for a blog and am writing a paper that I'll share here too when it is eventually finished.


AMEN!

I am particularly sick of the timidness of Rush, Hannity, Levin, etc. to call a spade a spade.

When someone says "Socialism", the uninformed American public thinks, "Well, at least it's not Communism."

The rhetoric of Conservatives and Republicans needs to clarify that Socialism IS Communism.  We must stop using this euphemism for Marxist theory and potential Leninist/Stalinist enforcement.  

It is my firm belief that a Presidency of Hillary Clinton, in conjunction with Leftist/Communist control of both Congress and the Courts will lead slowly and steadily towards a despotic police state.

It is a simple fact that no Communism can exist without totalitarian government.  The definition of Communism (as an economic system) is the total control of production (business) by the government.  This cannot occur unless the government also has total control of all aspects of it's citizen's lives.  If the goverment did not impose such control, a free market would naturally result.  In short, Communism = Tyranical Police State.

I know that I've heard the sentiment from many callers to all of the major Radio Talk Shows, and the hosts (including Rush) always try to downplay this sentiment.  What sentiment?  REVOLUTION!

Not like the Industrial Revolution, the Agricultural Revolution, the Scientific Revolution, the Information Revolution; but REAL revolution -- Bloody and violent Civil War in these United States.

Seriously, don't you sense it?  Feel it in your bones?  Can't you smell it coming?  A persistent feeling that things in this nation will soon come to a violent head?

What will you do when the police come to confiscate your guns at their own gunpoints?

View these websites for intelligent quotes about the right to bear arms.

http://www.fightthebias.com/Quotes/arms_quotes.htm

http://www.guncite.com/gc2ndcom.html

Does anyone doubt that FEDERAL gun control will eventually be a priority of a Hillary Clinton Administration?

The first step of any despotic tyrrany is to disarm the populace.  Only a tyrranical and despotic government fears armed citizens.

When they come (and they will) what will you do?  If you don't own a firearm, what will you do when they come for your neighbor's guns?

The upcoming Presidential election will be THE most important election in the 232 year history of this wonderful experiment called America.  Will we fall, or will we return to our roots?

If you doubt the severity/import of what I say, I will give you a  clue:  Should Hillary win the Presidency, watch for a "Night of the Long Knives" (google it if you don't know what I mean).  Not by violence (tho I wouldn't put it past the Clintons) but via prosecutions and persecution of political opponents on both sides of the aisle.

You may think I'm exaggerating or fear-mongering.  I truly believe that this nation could cease to exist in any recognizable form within our lifetimes.  I AM fear-mongering - but not for the sake of fear mongering.  I hope that Americans develop a rational fear of the true danger posed by Democrats & specifically Hillary Clinton.  I truly hope that more people take to heart the seriousness of electing a blatant Communist as President.
Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed.  -Abraham Lincoln


Every generation needs a new revolution. -Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Eyas
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: 09/06/07, 1:45 am

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby Antisoros on 10/21/07, 10:55 am

Is this the subforum moonbats are supposed to post in? ACLU members, "civil rights activists", people like that?
Antisoros
 
Posts: 99
Joined: 10/14/07, 7:38 am

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby SoldiersMum on 10/22/07, 12:25 am

Do you think I am a moonbat antisoros?  For heavens sake, ditch your name if you do not get it.  Moveon.org is a socialist organization owned by George S who is a major socialist.  He owns the Democrat Party.  If you don't believe it, just ask him.  He said he bought it, he paid for it, he owns it, and they are all totally afraid of him.  

Hillary Clinton has made numerous statements..how about.."We will take things away from you for the greater good"..for one.  Redistribution of wealth is a major socialist/communist ideology.  Hillary Clinton is a top-knotch Marxist.

I am not a moonbat.  Neither is Eyas.  If you cannot see that the DNC has been taken over by socialism, they you are blind.  Heck, even Ray Charles could see that.  Socialism is just a breath away from communism.  Unfortunately, what has happened in this country is that the socialists have taken over our Congress, our judiciary and our schools.  In this paragraph are 4 items that are in the agendas of the CPUSA and the Democratic Socialists of America.

1.  Take over a major political party in the U.S.  They have the DNC.  It's all their's now.
2.  Take over Congress.  Most of the members of the Progressive Congressional Caucus, approximately 60 of them, are also members of the DSA.
3.  Take over the judiciary to rule against the constitution.  Legislation from the bench has become the norm and socialist ideology supercedes the constitution.
4.  Take over the education of the population in order to indoctrinate the children. (It's an old ideology of Hitler who was a socialist despite what the liberals want everyone to believe.)

There are many others that have been and are being implemented, i.e., attack the family. attack religion, attack individualism, strengthen the unions, temper freedom of speech, attack the oneness and unity of the country by expanding on diversity, etc., etc., etc.

Our country is in grave danger and it comes from the danger within as well as the Islamofacist danger without.  

This is not moonbat theory.  This is reality.  You'd better get it or you should just go out and buy your burka, koran and prayer rug because if the socialists gain total control, the Islamofacists will not be far behind.

This country is headed for some horrible times.  I feel it in my bones.  I don't feel it will be a civil war per se, but that is not outside the realm of possibility when the socialists take the rest of our freedoms away...and they are working on them one by one.   Since they do not see a threat from the Islamofacists and want to do away with the Patriot act and any monitoring of terrorists activities via money tracking or wiretapping, the terrorists will make great strides and 9/11 will be a minor occurrence from what they have in mind for us.

Osama Bin Laden has received permission to kill 3 million of our children.  Right now school buses are missing in Texas, and plans have been found in Iraq Al-Qaida training camps by our troops which detail the insides of some of our schools.  What does Nancy Pelosi have to say about radical Muslims?  She says, come on into my off all you members of CAIR..let's talk.  What does Hillary Clinton say?  Well, it depends upon whom she is addressing but one of her statements is that she will talk..TALK..with Iran.  You cannot talk with Iran.  Amadenijad has one thing in mind..the destruction of Israel and the US so that their 12th Imam can return and bring the entire world under Islamic rule.  Lying to further Islam is stated right in the Koran as not only an acceptable procedure but a hailed one.  Iran cannot be talked to nor can any member of Al-Qaida or any radical fundamental Islamofacist.  The only thing they understand is strengh.  When the socialists take over, they will see a creampuff nation and celebrate in the streets.

No, antisoros, I am not a moonbat.  I am a thinker, a realist and a person terrified that the United States of America is headed towards the United Socialists States of America.  I am also frightfull that when I am very old, I will only be able to whisper very quietly to my great-great grandchildren my memories of how it used to be when the U.S. was that shining city on the hill.

Plutarch warned, "The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits."
User avatar
SoldiersMum
Moderator
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: 09/22/07, 1:05 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby Antisoros on 10/28/07, 10:42 pm

I know all that. I was simply asking if this forum was restricted to liberals only.

Yes, I think things could escalate soon - there is too much tension in the air, and you forgot to mention the totally corrupt MSM.

I don't think she'll win, but I'm well aware of a big lying socialist Hillary Clinton is. I don't think she can pull off  Chavez-style coup, our military (God bless them) would revolt against her.

Yeah, and Obama sucks, as does the Silky Pony.

http://www.thepeoplescube.com
Antisoros
 
Posts: 99
Joined: 10/14/07, 7:38 am

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby SoldiersMum on 10/28/07, 11:53 pm

Sorry, Antisoros.  I misunderstood you..that's the problem with just reading words and the internet I suppose.

You are right, HRC could never pull off a military coup.  The majority of the military hates her and her husband and they know what freedom and liberty are all about since they see it face-to-face every day and do what they do to provide us the same.  

My son says most of the people he knows will not reenlist if she is elected, so it looks like she will have to reinstate the draft in order to have an Army.  But..hey..she won't be doing much with them anyway..kumbaya..so why does she need a military of significant numbers..except that one of her declarations was that she couldn't say if she were Presidend that she would have the troops out of Iraq by 2013.  That was before she said she would take them out immediately but after she said that when she took office in January 2009, if they weren't out then she would take them out.  She's a John Kerry wannabe.   I guess she thinks that since the mainstream media covers her behind that she can tell whatever group she's talking to whatever they want to hear and it won't get reported.  She's wrong and the more she keeps up her flipflopping and the more she declares the giveaways to her designated group she's talking to, the more people are going to see she will do anything, say anything (and even try to do it in the accent or dialect of the people she's addressing) to get herself in the White House.  She really does do a very bad black accent and her southern accent is also horrendous.  I don't know who advised her to even attempt them.  If she's the Democrat nominee and the Republicans have grown some cajones, we will be seeing lots of ads covering all of her different personalities.  You can be sure they won't cover the real HRC who can swear better than a longshoreman..sorry all youse guys..

Plutarch warned, "The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits."
User avatar
SoldiersMum
Moderator
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: 09/22/07, 1:05 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby Eyas on 11/01/07, 1:29 pm

Yeah, Antisoros, I was a little confused by your first post, couldn't quite figure if it was serious or tongue in cheek.  

I was going to post again in this thread, & saw SoldiersMum's response, and figured I dind't want to get in the middle of things.   Glad we got that all figured out & patched up.


I certainly never considered that Hillary would stage a military coup.  I was actually thinking of it the other way around that she would try to usurp power and we would have to rely on a military coup to toss her out.

I'm thinking more long term than just a Hillary Presidency; but that a Hillary Presidency could be a major step forward along the road to eventually having a Leftist President and Congress who may someday finally remodel the government in the image of the ex-U.S.S.R..

I couldn't really give a good estimate on when things in this country might reach a head requiring a military coup/civil war/revolution.  But I see a conflict as being almost inevitable within, say, 50 to 100 years UNLESS the Leftist stranglehold on media and education (and therefore public sentiment) is broken.


Regardless, I truly believe that a totalitarian communist America with her as Czar would be Hillary's wet dream.   And I think that, if elected, she will do whatever she can to move this country as far to the Left as possible; if only for the future prospect of a Communist, Totalitarian America.
Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed.  -Abraham Lincoln


Every generation needs a new revolution. -Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Eyas
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: 09/06/07, 1:45 am

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby candance on 11/01/07, 2:18 pm

When the Clintons lost the governership in Arkansas the governer-elect had to sue them to have them removed from the mansion. They tried the same trick in the White House and then vandalized the White House when they finally moved out.
Just Say No to John McCain
candance
 
Posts: 260
Joined: 10/10/07, 3:52 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby SoldiersMum on 11/02/07, 3:14 am

And..you forgot to mention all the stuff they took that wasn't their's to take.  They had to return it all.

I see George Soros attempting to be our dictator someday after Hillbilly, Nan and Harry have turned the country into the USSA.

Plutarch warned, "The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits."
User avatar
SoldiersMum
Moderator
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: 09/22/07, 1:05 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Progressive Liberalism=Socialist=Communist Forum

Postby Thmiuatga on 11/02/07, 6:31 am

These people depend on the act of wordplay, deception and the act of altering perceptions to cajole and move people to support their objectives without them really understanding thier true intent.

I had in the past heard briefly about George Soros, but I read "Shadow Party" by Dr. David Horowitz. You wanna know just how deep and Soros has injected himselves into our society and political structure, read this book.

I don't know if you do but I recall Hillary Clinton saying publically that "We should get away from a it's everyone for themselves to a we're all in this togeather form of Government." I'm paraphrasing  plus I'm on my 4th beer but basically that's what she said.

Now it's possible that most people would not understand what she said and the hidden meaning behind it. You can find a lot of meaning behind what is not said, and though Rush said very recently that he's not introspective, I am.
(we were also born on the same day).

what Hillary meant was the elimination of individualism. This comes straight from Karl Marx and Vladmir Illyich Lenin.
If you need proof of this, go to the website of Neal Boortz. He is a lawyer and talkshow host who's been in the busines for over 30 years. There are archived quotes on his website made by Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Bill and Hillary Clinton concerning the end of the "cult of individualism."

If you haven't noticed, we are part of a group. We are classified due to ethnicity, sex and ideology. it's not good enough that we are Americans, I guess that's not important anymore (to liberals til they get in trouble). what burns
me is for all the crap they throw on us, when they get into hot water with other countries, all of a sudden they want to hide behind our flag, our beliefs, our laws. These are the things they normally disregard, dismiss, trample, desicrate and burn yet call it freedom of speech.

Well' I'm not a crimminal and the only record I have is of my military service, so dont't be offended because I and other veterans choose to beat your foolish asses for descecrating an American flag! Freedom of speech? NO IT'S NOT! You slap Hillary or Bill Clinton, you're going to jail for aggrivated assault. You openly speak out against Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Jiang Ziamin, Kim Jung Il, You'll be lucky if you are not executed!

These people want unopposed omnipotent rule and that is Socialsim. Big Government ie./community=communism but they'll never admit that.  there is much they won't reveal and they choose not to because they want to keep their actual intent hidden. This is their goal and they have their willing unquestioning  followers in the mainstream media pushing their agenda and ideology without question.
Thmiuatga
 
Posts: 24
Joined: 10/19/07, 3:29 am

Next

Return to Liberal Forums