IS EITHER McCAIN OR OBAMA ACCEPTABLE?
REPLACE THEM WITH BROKERED CONVENTIONS
REPLACE THEM WITH BROKERED CONVENTIONS
Your REAL NEWS editor is very disappointed with the choices of presumptive presidential candidates this coming election. I claim to be a politically right-wing conservative and am registered Independent. I
have never been registered Republican or Democrat. Fact is, I dislike the lying, dirty-trick Democratic national leadership more than I dislike the apathetic Republican national leadership.
In the past I have voted for Republican, for Democratic and for Third Party presidential candidates -- never missing voting in an election -- even actively petitioning, waving signs and donating money. This year I
don't see any presidential candidate that I want to indicate I agree with by giving them my vote.
Some of the Third Parties have really attracted the weirdos. Take the 9-11 conspiracy nuts who say the World Trade buildings weren't hot enough to melt steel. A little bit of knowledge can be dynamite. Steel
beams are shaped and welded together with flaming blow torches. The fires were hot enough to weaken the welds, causing steel beams to sag and separate. The extreme heat and the weight of falling beams caused the building structures to collapse. I remember that navy ship steel repairs had to be done with blow torches because sawing or grinding could weaken the welds holding steel together. Now I will be flooded with emails from nuts telling me how wrong I am.
Let's hope that the grass-root genuine Republican and Democrat delegates picked by their local areas to represent them at the Republican and Democratic party national presidential conventions to be held this
summer will realize that their presumptive leading candidates are inadequate losers. These politicians were foisted on the gullible American public by mostly left-wing news media propaganda and exorbitant campaign finance money to survive the state presidential primaries. The delegates need to place in nomination some genuine statesman-like Republicans and Democrats that we can be proud of.
Senator John McCain's liberal views on immigration, energy and environment conflict greatly with conservative Republican philosophy. Many Republicans don't think he even acts like a Republican.
Senator Barack Obama is causing his supporters to wonder if his solutions for "hope" and "change" justify his celebrity status and feel he might be more successful in Hollywood as a movie star. Obama's
presumptive lead came from the pledges of super delegates, who could easily change over to Senator Hillary Clinton. Both Obama and Hillary are Marxists. They both spout Karl Marx Communist Manifesto every time
they speak. Many voters like the idea of something for nothing by taking from the rich to give to the poor. Most Americans think that they hate "Communism" unless it is disguised as "Liberalism." Don't expect Obama to pick Hillary as his vice president because of the unlucky coincidence Clinton associates have with suicide (arkancide).
------------------------------------------------------------------
POLLS SHOW MORE VOTERS REJECT BOTH McCAIN AND OBAMA.
THIRD PARTY CANDIDATES PULLING CLOSE TO 20% OF TOTAL VOTE
By Joseph Farah, editor, WorldNetDaily August 11, 2008
THIRD PARTY CANDIDATES PULLING CLOSE TO 20% OF TOTAL VOTE
By Joseph Farah, editor, WorldNetDaily August 11, 2008
WASHINGTON - No question about it -- somebody is going to win the U.S. presidential election Nov. 4. There's also little dispute it will be either Republican John McCain or Democrat Barack Obama.
However, as the campaign goes on, more voters are running away from the two front-running candidates to other, much lesser-known, third-party candidates.
a.. An Associated TV/Zogby International poll released last week showed McCain leading Obama 42 percent to 41 percent -- leaving 17 percent either undecided or leaning to third-party candidates.
b.. A recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll had Obama with 47 percent to McCain's 43, leaving 10 percent to mostly third-party candidates when only Libertarian Party nominee Bob Barr and Peace and
Freedom Party nominee Ralph Nader are included in the choices. As other third-party candidates are added to the mix, the disaffection from the presumptive Democratic and Republican party nominees grows.
Nader is polling between 3 percent and 8 percent in various surveys. Barr reaches as high as 5 points. Most polls have not given prospective voters the opportunity of choosing any of the third-party options and those that have included only Nader, Barr and Cynthia McKinney of the Green Party.
Excluded from all major polls to date are Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin or America's Independent Party Candidate Alan Keyes. All of those options and others will be included in polling to be
conducted this weekend by WorldNetDaily and Zogby.
"It just stands to reason that people are more likely to announce their support of candidates who are mentioned by pollsters," explained WND Editor Joseph Farah, author of the new book, "None of the Above". He makes the case for supporting third-party candidates or writing in another choice because, he asserts, the two front runners are both unworthy of the highest office in the land. "I don't want to say there has been a conspiracy among the pollsters and major media to exclude any mention of the alternatives, but, until now, it is a fact, nonetheless."
Among the polls that have included Barr, Nader and McKinney, it is also clear that more votes are being sucked away from Obama than McCain.
If McCain is elected, he will remake the Republican Party in his own image -- one more suitable to Democrats and less suitable to those who believe in the party's actual platform since 1980.
If Obama is elected, the country will hurt as a result of policies he executes at the behest of the Democrats in Congress, but it will be Obama and the Democrats who get the blame -- leading possibly to another Reagan Revolution as occurred following Jimmy Carter's four-year term ending in 1980.
But the biggest reason for voting for neither of them is that it is simply wrong to do so -- it's immoral to vote for any candidate who is not going to uphold the fundamental tenets of our Constitution."
However, as the campaign goes on, more voters are running away from the two front-running candidates to other, much lesser-known, third-party candidates.
a.. An Associated TV/Zogby International poll released last week showed McCain leading Obama 42 percent to 41 percent -- leaving 17 percent either undecided or leaning to third-party candidates.
b.. A recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll had Obama with 47 percent to McCain's 43, leaving 10 percent to mostly third-party candidates when only Libertarian Party nominee Bob Barr and Peace and
Freedom Party nominee Ralph Nader are included in the choices. As other third-party candidates are added to the mix, the disaffection from the presumptive Democratic and Republican party nominees grows.
Nader is polling between 3 percent and 8 percent in various surveys. Barr reaches as high as 5 points. Most polls have not given prospective voters the opportunity of choosing any of the third-party options and those that have included only Nader, Barr and Cynthia McKinney of the Green Party.
Excluded from all major polls to date are Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin or America's Independent Party Candidate Alan Keyes. All of those options and others will be included in polling to be
conducted this weekend by WorldNetDaily and Zogby.
"It just stands to reason that people are more likely to announce their support of candidates who are mentioned by pollsters," explained WND Editor Joseph Farah, author of the new book, "None of the Above". He makes the case for supporting third-party candidates or writing in another choice because, he asserts, the two front runners are both unworthy of the highest office in the land. "I don't want to say there has been a conspiracy among the pollsters and major media to exclude any mention of the alternatives, but, until now, it is a fact, nonetheless."
Among the polls that have included Barr, Nader and McKinney, it is also clear that more votes are being sucked away from Obama than McCain.
If McCain is elected, he will remake the Republican Party in his own image -- one more suitable to Democrats and less suitable to those who believe in the party's actual platform since 1980.
If Obama is elected, the country will hurt as a result of policies he executes at the behest of the Democrats in Congress, but it will be Obama and the Democrats who get the blame -- leading possibly to another Reagan Revolution as occurred following Jimmy Carter's four-year term ending in 1980.
But the biggest reason for voting for neither of them is that it is simply wrong to do so -- it's immoral to vote for any candidate who is not going to uphold the fundamental tenets of our Constitution."
