Operation Chaos has the advantage that no matter who looses, we win. The drive-bys can try and spin it how they will, but it doesn't change this fact. Now my question is, after Operation Chaos is over in January (November, whatever), what do we do next? OC has been able to fire up the conservative base and make politics fun again- goes to show that when the personal actions of individuals make a difference, they can care, even when their representatives are completely out of touch.
That being said, we now know we have an effective vehicle to nudge people to try something. The benefits of OC was that you saw a near-immediate result and conclusions to those actions. I was hoping there would be a way to apply this kind of organized action to debunking the MMGW myth and prevent legislation that would further harm our economy.
With OC, we had an upcoming important election to spur people to action. Now we have increasing gas prices and cost of food to worry about. Btw, it's not just oil that's driving up food prices, it's legislation that is trying to force the whole 'organic' swindle to become the norm (see Rushes update on California's legislation that drastically effects this year's strawberry crop). There are many other ways that the influence of the environmentalist cult is harming us as a nation, but these two issues are ones that everyone has to notice. With the elections, it was a matter of popular discussion. With these issues it becomes even more personal (daily financial cost) and is also somewhat of note in the drive-by media.
Obviously, these will be issues where the incoming administration will be set against logic and reality, no matter which liberal wins. This gives the operation a continuing tie to the usual political content of Rush's show. He could even continue the trend of gloating over the continuing failures of MMGW assertions. The question remains now of what official action can individuals take that could have a response in a reasonable amount of time. It would have to be something that pretty much demands a response in the drive-bys, be it positive (unlikely) or negative.
Something should be clicking here, but it's not at just this moment. Perhaps it's because it's 1:30am, and I have to get up in 5 hours (yes, I'm still young enough for that). Or maybe it's because I'm not sure Rush has the same conviction and interest in the subject. He's a brilliant guy, and I'm sure he could make it work were it pitched to him, but we're conservatives here, and we don't rely on others to do everything for us. This whole idea needs a iconic vehicle like the candidates- preferably one that is readily recognized and already of notice to the drive-bys. This would have been a lot simpler if we could have had a nominee that was actually a conservative, and some debates that brought up the MMGW topic.
However, these resources are not available just now, so we'll have to look further afield. Outside the U.S. in Britain, perhaps? With the people's obvious distaste for the Cap'n'Trade failures, as evidenced by the ousting of the Labor Party and return of the Tories, a popular voice over there would be a good starting point, be it a rock star, actor, athlete, public official, what have you. Any candidates? When it comes to Hollywood, we've seen how much coverage these less than official sources get. A visiting person of this nature could kick the whole thing off and continue to be the lightning rod for cultist dissent. And who knows, maybe some famous Americans of similar stripe will follow suit to give it more publicity.
Please, let's sketch out some possibilities and don't be afraid to play devil's advocate here.




