the Yeti wrote:

Eyas wrote:Pictures of ANWR and the Proposed drilling site:


And, Just as a reminder:


A lush, natural paradise ... non?

This is how I envision the Garden of Eden; how 'bout you?

U.S. PresidentDwight D. Eisenhower thought it was .  Why did the totally controlled GOP run country NOT change the status when they HAD THE POWER ??

The answer of course is that the GOP majority in the Senate was not being run by conservatives but rather by a group of 14 RINOs (including the current GOP Standard Bearer) who agreed with the Democrats on just about everything.  The majority was not large enough to counter things when 14 Republicans left the reservation like a bunch of headless vectors.

SoldiersMum wrote:

the Yeti wrote:

Eyas wrote:Pictures of ANWR and the Proposed drilling site:


And, Just as a reminder:


A lush, natural paradise ... non?

This is how I envision the Garden of Eden; how 'bout you?

U.S. PresidentDwight D. Eisenhower thought it was .  Why did the totally controlled GOP run country NOT change the status when they HAD THE POWER ??

The answer of course is that the GOP majority in the Senate was not being run by conservatives but rather by a group of 14 RINOs (including the current GOP Standard Bearer) who agreed with the Democrats on just about everything.  The majority was not large enough to counter things when 14 Republicans left the reservation like a bunch of headless vectors.

Oh it's the RINO's again. it could not be the GOP of course. You really dont think they could have if they wanted too??  I think libertarian is the way to go.

the Yeti wrote:Oh it's the RINO's again. it could not be the GOP of course. You really dont think they could have if they wanted too??  I think libertarian is the way to go.

We'll we can't thank you enough for your opinion, but I think 'Green Party' is the way to go!!  Go Green!!

Yeti,

What does "GOP" mean?

That's a hard one...

OK, i googled it and it looks like "Grand Old Party".  

Soon they will be known as the Whigs.

I actually think that there is much to like about the liberterian party.

The major problem I have is that the federal goverment as conceived by our forefathers most fundamental role is to provide for our national defense. I can not support a party that does not include this as a major part of its platform.

I consider radical Islamism a real and present threat to our country.

dittohead wrote:I actually think that there is much to like about the liberterian party.

The major problem I have is that the federal goverment as conceived by our forefathers most fundamental role is to provide for our national defense. I can not support a party that does not include this as a major part of its platform.

I consider radical Islamism a real and present threat to our country.

Agreed. This is the major reason I would not support Ron Paul.